Dock power

Discussion on anything

Re: Dock power

Postby skeeter » Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:48 am

[quote="MackDo you suppose the commercial docks are going to have to convert? I'll be asking that question next week at the high school.[/quote]

From what I understand, these regulations from our unelected Bureaucrats at the USACE are directed at private dock owners who are a much softer target than Marina owners, some of whom are still stonewalling and squabbling over the requirement to replace white foam floats with encapsulated foam floats.

Power use by the typical Marina with Ice storage Freezers, Air-Conditioned Office(s), Gas pumps, Refrigerated Coolers, Bait tank water and air pumps and other things I'm not thinking of would seem far beyond the ability and capacity of Solar Power. Cannot imagine how many large lead/acid storage batteries and number of square feet of Solar Panels those electrically powered items would require.
User avatar
skeeter
Local Gold
Local Gold
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Southern Stone County

Re: Dock power

Postby Mack » Fri Jul 28, 2017 11:36 am

skeeter wrote:[quote="MackDo you suppose the commercial docks are going to have to convert? I'll be asking that question next week at the high school.


From what I understand, these regulations from our unelected Bureaucrats at the USACE are directed at private dock owners who are a much softer target than Marina owners, some of whom are still stonewalling and squabbling over the requirement to replace white foam floats with encapsulated foam floats.

Power use by the typical Marina with Ice storage Freezers, Air-Conditioned Office(s), Gas pumps, Refrigerated Coolers, Bait tank water and air pumps and other things I'm not thinking of would seem far beyond the ability and capacity of Solar Power. Cannot imagine how many large lead/acid storage batteries and number of square feet of Solar Panels those electrically powered items would require.[/quote]

And if 'going green' is one of the reasons, just one marina with a restaurant will leave a larger 'carbon foot print' than 50% of community docks combined. I know I'm going to lose, but Billy and Roy are getting a reminder from me a couple of times a week. The whole thing is a crock of crap.
Mack
Local Silver
Local Silver
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Aunts Creek

Re: Dock power

Postby skeeter » Fri Jul 28, 2017 12:22 pm

[quote="Mack The whole thing is a crock of crap.[/quote]

Totally agree, right along with their incredible hypocrisy of saying they are so terribly concerned with the health of the shoreline and do and say nothing about the ridiculous erosion, property damage and safety issues the outlandish, oversized Cruisers and plowing Wake Boats cause.

I'm planning on attending the "workshop" ( what an asinine term ) in Reeds Spring Wed. and giving them an earful.
User avatar
skeeter
Local Gold
Local Gold
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Southern Stone County

Re: Dock power

Postby Mack » Fri Jul 28, 2017 3:33 pm

skeeter wrote:[quote="Mack The whole thing is a crock of crap.


Totally agree, right along with their incredible hypocrisy of saying they are so terribly concerned with the health of the shoreline and do and say nothing about the ridiculous erosion, property damage and safety issues the outlandish, oversized Cruisers and plowing Wake Boats cause.

I'm planning on attending the "workshop" ( what an asinine term ) in Reeds Spring Wed. and giving them an earful.[/quote]

As will I. Back to the commercial docks, there's no excuse for the rental slips not to be solar powered. And we get 2-3 ft. rollers crashing the shore line on the weekends. All from the wake board and go fast boats.
Mack
Local Silver
Local Silver
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Aunts Creek

Re: Dock power

Postby FAADAN » Sat Jul 29, 2017 8:26 pm

Exactly what does "protecting the shoreline" have to do with the generation of power or flood control, the primary purposes of the lake as stated by Congress when they authorized it to be built. The most damage to the shoreline is done when the lake is flooded. Flooding, and delaying the release of water kills all the vegetation up to where it was flooded. If they want to save the shoreline, all they have to do is stop letting the lake flood. Of course, that would violate the primary reason for building the lake in the first place. This is all just an effort to attack people who own land around the lake and want to use that land to their advantage. Simply a bureaucracy gone rogue.
Gridlock is Good
User avatar
FAADAN
Local Gold
Local Gold
 
Posts: 3775
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Kimberling City, MO

Re: Dock power

Postby skeeter » Mon Jul 31, 2017 9:42 am

FAADAN wrote:Exactly what does "protecting the shoreline" have to do with the generation of power or flood control, the primary purposes of the lake as stated by Congress when they authorized it to be built. The most damage to the shoreline is done when the lake is flooded. Flooding, and delaying the release of water kills all the vegetation up to where it was flooded. If they want to save the shoreline, all they have to do is stop letting the lake flood. Of course, that would violate the primary reason for building the lake in the first place. This is all just an effort to attack people who own land around the lake and want to use that land to their advantage. Simply a bureaucracy gone rogue.


Wish that repeated and long-lasting flooding and high water levels would kill these invasive Eastern Red Cedars that have taken over and ruined so much land.....but it hasn't. We need a "bug" like the rapidly spreading Emerald Ash Borer that would target the Cedar trees.
User avatar
skeeter
Local Gold
Local Gold
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Southern Stone County

Re: Dock power

Postby Mack » Mon Jul 31, 2017 3:45 pm

skeeter wrote:
FAADAN wrote:Exactly what does "protecting the shoreline" have to do with the generation of power or flood control, the primary purposes of the lake as stated by Congress when they authorized it to be built. The most damage to the shoreline is done when the lake is flooded. Flooding, and delaying the release of water kills all the vegetation up to where it was flooded. If they want to save the shoreline, all they have to do is stop letting the lake flood. Of course, that would violate the primary reason for building the lake in the first place. This is all just an effort to attack people who own land around the lake and want to use that land to their advantage. Simply a bureaucracy gone rogue.


Wish that repeated and long-lasting flooding and high water levels would kill these invasive Eastern Red Cedars that have taken over and ruined so much land.....but it hasn't. We need a "bug" like the rapidly spreading Emerald Ash Borer that would target the Cedar trees.


You can now cut down cedars that are 3" at the base vs the old rule of 2" at 4'. The net difference is zero. We pay these people's salary.
Mack
Local Silver
Local Silver
 
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: Aunts Creek

Previous

Return to The Soap Box

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest

cron